|
in quantum field theories are defined as the algebras of observable operators, and as such, they are also related to the von Neumann algebra; quantum operators are usually defined on Hilbert spaces, or in some QFTs on Hilbert space bundles or other similar families of spaces.
Note: representations of Banach *-algebras, that are also defined on Hilbert spaces, are related to -algebra representations which provide a useful approach to defining quantum space-times.
Quantum Operator Algebras in Quantum Field Theories: QOAs in QFTs Examples of quantum operators are: the Hamiltonian operator (or Schrödinger operator), the position and momentum operators, Casimir operators, Unitary operators, spin operators, and so on. The observable operators are also self-adjoint. More general operators were recently
defined, such as Progogine's superoperators. Another development in quantum theories is the introduction of Frechét nuclear spaces or `rigged' Hilbert spaces (Hilbert bundles). The following sections define several types of quantum operator algebras that provide the foundation of modern quantum field theories in mathematical physics.
Quantum theories adopted a new lease of life post 1955 when von Neumann beautifully re-formulated quantum mechanics (QM) and Quantum theories (QT) in the mathematically rigorous context of Hilbert spaces and operator algebras defined over such spaces. From a current physics perspective, von Neumann' s approach to quantum mechanics has however done much more: it has not only paved the way to expanding the role of symmetry in physics, as for example with the Wigner-Eckhart theorem and its applications, but also revealed the fundamental importance in Quantum physics of the state space geometry of quantum
operator algebras- Mathematical definitions
Definitions:
- Von Neumann Algebra
- Hopf Algebra
- Groupoids
- Haar systems associated to Measured Groupoids or Locally Compact Groupoids.
.
Let denote a complex (separable) Hilbert space. A von Neumann algebra
acting on is a subset of the algebra of all bounded operators
such that:
- (i)
is closed under the adjoint operation (with the adjoint of an element denoted by ).
- (ii)
equals its bicommutant, namely:
 |
(1.1) |
If one calls a commutant of a set
the special set of bounded operators on
which commute with all elements in
, then this second condition implies that the commutant of the commutant of
is again the set
.
On the other hand, a von Neumann algebra
inherits a unital subalgebra from
, and according to the first condition in its definition
does indeed inherit a *-subalgebra structure, as further explained in the next section on C*-algebras. Furthermore, we have notable Bicommutant Theorem which states that
is a von Neumann algebra if and only if
is a *-subalgebra of
, closed for the smallest topology defined by continuous maps
for all
where denotes the inner product defined on . For a well-presented treatment of the geometry of the state spaces of quantum operator algebras, see e.g. Aflsen and Schultz (2003).
First, a unital associative algebra consists of a linear space together with two linear maps
satisfying the conditions
This first condition can be seen in terms of a commuting diagram :
 |
(1.4) |
Next suppose we consider `reversing the arrows', and take an algebra equipped with a linear homorphisms
, satisfying, for :
We call a comultiplication, which is said to be coasociative in so far that the following diagram commutes
 |
(1.6) |
There is also a counterpart to , the counity map
satisfying
 |
(1.7) |
A bialgebra
is a linear space with maps
satisfying the above properties.
Now to recover anything resembling a group structure, we must append such a bialgebra with an antihomomorphism
, satisfying
, for . This map is defined implicitly via the property :
 |
(1.8) |
We call the antipode map. A Hopf algebra is then a bialgebra
equipped with an antipode map .
Commutative and noncommutative Hopf algebras form the backbone of quantum `groups' and are essential to the generalizations of symmetry. Indeed, in most respects a quantum `group' is identifiable with a Hopf algebra. When such algebras are actually associated with proper groups of matrices there is considerable scope for their representations on both finite and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces.
Recall that a groupoid
is, loosely speaking, a small category with inverses over its set of objects
. One often writes
for the set of morphisms in
from to . A topological groupoid consists of a space
, a distinguished subspace
, called the space of objects of
, together with maps
![$\displaystyle r,s~:~ \xymatrix{ {\mathsf{G}}\ar@<1ex>[r]^r \ar[r]_s & {\mathsf{G}}^{(0)} }$ $\displaystyle r,s~:~ \xymatrix{ {\mathsf{G}}\ar@<1ex>[r]^r \ar[r]_s & {\mathsf{G}}^{(0)} }$](http://images.planetphysics.org/cache/objects/314/l2h/img58.png) |
(1.9) |
called the range and source maps respectively, together with a law of composition
 |
(1.10) |
such that the following hold :
- (1)
-
, for all
.
- (2)
-
, for all
.
- (3)
-
, for all
.
- (4)
-
.
- (5)
- Each
has a two-sided inverse
with
. Furthermore, only for topological groupoids the inverse map needs be continuous. It is usual to call
the set of objects of
. For
, the set of arrows
forms a group
, called the isotropy group of
at .
Thus, as is well kown, a topological groupoid is just a groupoid internal to the category of topological spaces and continuous maps. The notion of internal groupoid has proved significant in a number of fields, since groupoids generalise bundles of groups, group actions, and equivalence relations. For a further study of groupoids we refer the reader to Brown (2006).
Several examples of groupoids are: (a) locally compact groups, transformation groups , and any group in general (e.g. [59] (b) equivalence relations (c) tangent bundles (d) the tangent groupoid (e.g. [4]) (e) holonomy groupoids for foliations (e.g. [4]) (f) Poisson groupoids (e.g. [81]) (g) graph groupoids (e.g. [47, 64]).
As a simple, helpful example of a groupoid, consider (b) above. Thus, let R be an equivalence relationhttp://planetphysics.org/encyclopedia/Bijective.html on a set X. Then R is a groupoid under the following operations:
. Here,
, (the diagonal of
) and
. So =
. When
, R is called a trivial groupoid. A special case of a trivial groupoid is
. (So every i is equivalent to every j). Identify
with the matrix unit . Then the groupoid is just matrix multiplication except that we only multiply
when , and
. We do not really lose anything by restricting the multiplication, since the pairs
excluded from groupoid multiplication just give the 0 product in normal algebra anyway. For a groupoid
to be a locally compact groupoid means that
is required to be a (second countable) locally compact Hausdorff space, and the product and also inversion maps are required to be continuous. Each
as well as the unit space
is closed in
. What replaces the left Haar measure on
is a system of measures (
), where is a positive regular Borel measure on
with dense support. In addition, the â @ Ys are required to vary continuously (when integrated against
and to form an invariant family in the sense that for each x, the map
is a measure preserving homeomorphism from
onto
. Such a system
is called a left Haar system for the locally compact groupoid
.
This is defined more precisely next.
Let
![$\displaystyle \xymatrix{ {\mathsf{G}}\ar@<1ex>[r]^r \ar[r]_s & {\mathsf{G}}^{(0)}}=X$ $\displaystyle \xymatrix{ {\mathsf{G}}\ar@<1ex>[r]^r \ar[r]_s & {\mathsf{G}}^{(0)}}=X$](http://images.planetphysics.org/cache/objects/314/l2h/img112.png) |
(1.11) |
be a locally compact, locally trivial topological groupoid with its transposition into transitive (connected) components. Recall that for , the costar of denoted
is defined as the closed set
, whereby
 |
(1.12) |
is a principal
-bundle relative to fixed base points
. Assuming all relevant sets are locally compact, then following Seda (1976), a (left) Haar system on
denoted
(for later purposes), is defined to comprise of i) a measure on
, ii) a measure on and iii) a measure on
such that for every Baire set of
, the following hold on setting
:
- (1)
-
is measurable.
- (2)
-
.
- (3)
-
, for all
and
.
The presence of a left Haar system on
has important topological implications: it requires that the range map
is open. For such a
with a left Haar system, the vector space
is a convolution *-algebra, where for
:
, with f*(x)
. One has
to be the enveloping C*-algebra of
(and also representations are required to be continuous in the inductive limit topology). Equivalently, it is the completion of
where
is the universal representation of
. For example, if
, then
is just the finite dimensional algebra
, the span of the 's.
There exists (e.g.[63, p.91]) a measurable Hilbert bundlehttp://planetphysics.org/encyclopedia/HilbertBundle.html
with
and a G-representation L on . Then, for every pair of square integrable sections of , it is required that the function
be -measurable. The representation of
is then given by:
.
The triple
is called a measurable
-Hilbert bundle.
- 1
- E. M. Alfsen and F. W. Schultz: Geometry of State Spaces of Operator Algebras, Birkhäuser, Boston-Basel-Berlin (2003).
- 2
- I. Baianu : Categories, Functors and Automata Theory: A Novel Approach to Quantum Automata through Algebraic-Topological Quantum Computations., Proceed. 4th Intl. Congress LMPS, (August-Sept. 1971).
- 3
- I.C. Baianu, N. Boden and D. Lightowlers.1981. NMR Spin-Echo Responses of Dipolar-Coupled Spin-1/2 Triads in Solids., J. Magnetic Resonance, 43:101-111.
- 4
- I. C. Baianu, J. F. Glazebrook and R. Brown.: A Non-Abelian, Categorical Ontology of Spacetimes and Quantum Gravity., Axiomathes 17,(3-4): 353-408(2007).
- 5
- F.A. Bais, B. J. Schroers and J. K. Slingerland: Broken quantum symmetry and confinement phases in planar physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 No. 18 (1-4): 181-201 (2002).
- 6
- J.W. Barrett.: Geometrical measurements in three-dimensional quantum gravity. Proceedings of the Tenth Oporto Meeting on Geometry, Topology and Physics (2001).Intl. J. Modern Phys. A 18 , October, suppl., 97â @ S113 (2003)
- 7
- M. Chaician and A. Demichev: Introduction to Quantum Groups, World Scientific (1996).
- 8
- Coleman and De Luccia: Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay., Phys. Rev. D 21: 3305 (1980).
- 9
- A. Connes: Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press 1994.
- 10
- L. Crane and I.B. Frenkel. Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, Hopf categories, and the canonical bases. Topology and physics. J. Math. Phys. 35 (no. 10): 5136-5154 (1994).
- 11
- W. Drechsler and P. A. Tuckey: On quantum and parallel transport in a Hilbert bundle over spacetime., Classical and Quantum Gravity, 13:611-632 (1996). doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/13/4/004
- 12
- V. G. Drinfel'd: Quantum groups, In Proc. Int. Cong. of Mathematicians, Berkeley 1986, (ed. A. Gleason), Berkeley, 798-820 (1987).
- 13
- G. J. Ellis: Higher dimensional crossed modules of algebras, J. of Pure Appl. Algebra 52 (1988), 277-282.
- 14
- P.. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko, Solutions of the Quantum Dynamical Yang-Baxter Equation and Dynamical Quantum Groups, Comm.Math.Phys., 196: 591-640 (1998)
- 15
- P. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko: Exchange dynamical quantum groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 205 (1): 19-52 (1999)
- 16
- P. I. Etingof and O. Schiffmann: Lectures on the dynamical Yang-Baxter equations, in Quantum Groups and Lie Theory (Durham, 1999), pp. 89-129, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
- 17
- B. Fauser: A treatise on quantum Clifford Algebras. Konstanz, Habilitationsschrift.
arXiv.math.QA/0202059 (2002).
- 18
- B. Fauser: Grade Free product Formulae from Grassman-Hopf Gebras. Ch. 18 in R. Ablamowicz, Ed., Clifford Algebras: Applications to Mathematics, Physics and Engineering, Birkhäuser: Boston, Basel and Berlin, (2004).
- 19
- J. M. G. Fell.:The Dual Spaces of C*-Algebras, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 94: 365-403 (1960).
- 20
- F.M. Fernandez and E. A. Castro.: (Lie) Algebraic Methods in Quantum Chemistry and Physics., Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc (1996).
- 21
- R. P. Feynman: Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics, 20: 367-387 (1948). [It is also reprinted in (Schwinger 1958).]
- 22
- A. Fröhlich, Non-Abelian Homological Algebra. I. Derived functors and satellites., Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 11: 239-252 (1961).
- 23
- Gel'fand, I. and Naimark, M., 1943, On the Imbedding of Normed Rings into the Ring of Operators in Hilbert Space, Recueil Mathématique [Matematicheskii Sbornik] Nouvelle Série, 12 [54]: 197-213. [Reprinted in C*-algebras: 1943-1993, in the series Contemporary Mathematics, 167, Providence, R.I. : American Mathematical Society, 1994.]
- 24
- R. Gilmore: ``Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications.'', Dover Publs., Inc.: Mineola and New York, 2005.
- 25
- P. Hahn: Haar measure for measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 242: 1-33(1978).
- 26
- P. Hahn: The regular representations of measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 242:34-72(1978).
- 27
- R. Heynman and S. Lifschitz. 1958. ``Lie Groups and Lie Algebras''., New York and London: Nelson Press.
- 28
- C. Heunen, N. P. Landsman, B. Spitters.: A topos for algebraic quantum theory, (2008)
arXiv:0709.4364v2 [quant-ph]
|